Saturday, February 25, 2012

Drive


Drive, a motivation book written by Daniel Pink elaborates on the fundamental concepts that “drive” us to do what we do and how we do it. Pink thoroughly explains that our ability to perform tasks effectively are driven by our inner needs (what will we get in the end). Pink builds the book on three main concepts:  autonomy, mastery & purpose. He explains that without these fundamentals, humans have no need to work, prosper or achieve any form of reward. In the end, autonomy, mastery & purpose are what drives us to be who we are, it forms the basis of businesses but most importantly it’s the motivational pieces that form our leadership roles.  
            As a whole, I really enjoyed reading the sections where Pink addresses the three main elements. Below are the key points that Pink makes while explaining each element and how they hold a role in any leadership/work environment-----

            The first element that Pink addresses is autonomy. Autonomy is having a sense of independence or in other words, it’s the large scope of having freedom. Pink gives numerous examples of how autonomy is incorporated not only in our own lives but more importantly along the lines of the business spectrum. For instance, in chapter 4, he gives an example of a man named Gunther who launched an autonomy based experiment at one of his companies, Meddius. Gunther incorporated into the work environment “ROWE” which stands for results only work environment. ROWE gives employees the freedom to work without a schedule. I feel like this is conventional because it offers a sense of freedom from the norm of the workforce. From my personal experience with working in groups, I’ve noticed that this idea does function effectively. It allows members of a group to achieve more because it takes the thought of stress off the table. Great idea in my opinion!
            Secondly, the book addresses the element, mastery. Mastery is the ability to grasp a certain ability, for instance, the mastery of Spanish. Mastery is what helps drive us to compete and what helps us acknowledge what we are good at and how far we can push ourselves. Within the chapter, the author points out that the concept of “Flow” is an important  aspect of mastery. Flow is the idea that goals are meant to be clear and in reach. Most importantly, the relational abilities of what a person can and cannot do was perfect. Flow is the state where a person’s ability is just right to do the job. No task is out of hand because a person is not qualified to obtain it. While I was reading this, I felt that Pink does make a good point. As a leader, you have to find out what are the strengths and weaknesses of others let alone yourself so you can judge where to place people in certain situations, making them feel that their talents are well utilized. This is what I think is key in having good leadership skills.
            Lastly, there’s purpose. Purpose is the central thought behind everything (Why are we here? What’s our goal? What’s the world to me?). Stated on page 132, the book says, “ From the moment that human beings first stared into the sky, contemplated their place in the universe, and tried to create something that bettered the world and outlasted their lives, we have been purpose seekers.” Purpose is what truly motivates each and every one of us to do the things that we do on a daily basis. Whether it’s from going to work, school or working on an art piece, our inner drive to do it is what pushes us to great lengths. With purpose, comes goals and the impact it has on our lives. With the goals we set for ourselves, we can see how it will affect us in the long run. Evidently, the meaning of purpose is to help people understand that life is govern by what you make of it what drives you to be the person that you are and how you get there. This concept, I feel is strongly present in the whole leadership spectrum.


            As I look back to the key elements of the book, I’ve realized that the majority of what Pink is saying corresponds to the aspects of leadership. If you take a look, leadership is having the ability to lead others but nonetheless, be aware of other social aspects that people may bring to the table. Pink formerly introduces the thought of autonomy and how CEO’s of companies are utilizing the idea to produce more productivity, the same thing goes for leadership. If the leader of a group gives his/her followers more room to be independent, more creative and productive thoughts would come out of the mix. Autonomy plays a major part in leadership, by addressing the need to have freedom and the ability to be able to grow. In a way, I think it’s a good part in the process of forming new leaders.
            Also, when I read the sections on mastery and purpose, it helped me understand leadership more clearly. To be a leader, one has to be driven, motivated and possess the ability to help others in a positive way. However, in order to achieve this glorified act, one has to have a purpose and set of mastery skills in order to lead. Mastery is basically self explanatory, it’s the act of doing a task perfectly with no hassles along the way. Purpose, is knowing what role a person possesses. As pink explains, these are two of the three elements that helps people understand themselves more clearly. I believe after reading this book that leaders, let alone leadership, are based on a set of mastery skills that serve a purpose in helping the lives of others.  
            Another thing also comes to mind when I think about the books concepts. All of the three are aspects that I experience in my own life, leadership wise or not. As I think about autonomy coming from a leadership standpoint, I see the importance it plays for giving others the room to grow and follow their own path in a positive way. From my personal standpoint, I see autonomy being essential  because people are driven by independence and having the choice to be given the right to make their own decisions versus following a set of govern rules. Also, I use mastery and purpose in certain leadership positions to more effectively help others. No one wants a leader or person in charge who doesn’t have a clue what he/she is doing. I’ve come to a realization that mastery is important because you can only lead by what you know very well and what you are good at, and that’s the overall purpose you’re trying to achieve when striving to help others.
            Overall, I really enjoyed reading this book because it has helped me realize that leadership is built on core concepts and will always remain this way. Also, we may not agree that many of us are leaders, but if you think about it, we are. Some individuals are big leaders while others target a smaller group. This book has really helped me understand what goes into leadership/high power roles in society and has made me understand what it takes to achieve those positions.
Again, overall great book!

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Tuckman's Model

When I think about Tuckman's model I immediately think about being apart of The National Honor Society back in high school. I know I'm in college now but that was the first thought that popped into my mind....

If you think closely, being apart of The National Honor Society does follow the Tuckman Model.

Forming

  • The book centers that the meaning of forming is the initial stage of putting a group together, which is true. 
For instance, The National Honor Society was formed on the merits of good academics. Students who accumulated above a 3.0 for all four years in high school were given the privilege to join. Letters of requirements were passed to all students who qualified and thus, this way the first step in the formation of NHS. Also, once admitted, roles such as President, Secretary...etc were to be assigned(cast by votes). Each position played an important role in how NHS would run. Year after year, NHS used this method to form a group based on new members.




Storming 
In NHS, we came to a lot of standstills when it came to this certain stage. Matters of opinion differed from one individual to the next, making it hard for many of us to agree on the same subject. For starts, we did a lot of blood drives, food drives, and charity work through my high school. The NHS was in charge of all of it but the trouble was having everyone agree on how to run about putting all aspects together. Our main issues always came to working the blood drives, specifically with "who can work". We eventually solved the issue with giving those with more flexible schedules to work longer and those with limited time to carry out the little duties such as, stocking the snack table, passing out booklets and cleanup.

Norming  

  • The book explains that norming follows storming in the attempt to make readers understand that "norming" is how a group functions on a regular basis after learning how the group typically interacts.
When I used to be in NHS, the group did have a distinct pattern. We always held meetings every Tuesday, our head chairman always started out with a greeting and a brief synopsis of the meeting. Also, during these meetings, members always knew to volunteer for upcoming projects around the school. 

Performing
When it comes to this part of the model, NHS was definitely an 'Ongoing Group'. We had many projects in line for the whole school year, however, each event gave room/time to plan. In order to plan out and work out certain events we always held a sign up sheet outside of the meeting room door. Making it easy for those who are interested in working on a project to sign up. Also, the weekly meetings makes it easy to keep tasks in order and refreshed. 

Adjourning
  • The book points out that the last step of the model is based on a group's ability to be recognized and participate in a celebration of their work. 
I totally agree with this statement because that was exactly how I ended my time in The National Honor Society. With the hard work that the members of the group and myself put towards blood drives and food drives we were greatly recognized for it. We all received badges of recognition and I received a stole to wear during graduation as well as other selected members. I believe that all groups want to be praised when they reach this point of the journey. 



                                        



                                                     


Friday, February 3, 2012

What's Your Type?

After taking the Jung Typology Test, I ended up getting ENTJ.


ENTJ Stands for the following:
Extraverted
Intuitive
Thinking
Judging


I wasn't really surprised by my results, especially the extraverted part. Being extraverted means surrounding yourself with the outside world versus being condemned to inner sanctions. I know there may be times where I may not feel comfortable in a social setting but overall, I am very outgoing and expressive person. 


As for Intuitive, I define it as having the ability to be instinctive and perceptive to things/aspects that surrounds us. In a way, I can relate because I often find myself thinking of different viewpoints on a given subject and I feel I have the mindset to see where others are often coming from. 


Thinking, in my terms, basically means having logic to reason and be rational. Overall, aren't we all thinking animals? I feel that this term not only suites me but it falls for everyone. We all are always going through a thinking process on a daily basis. Whether it's considering what to wear or how to solve a problem on a math exam, the process/word of thinking is always continuous. 


Lastly, there's Judging. Judging means to act upon in order to make a logical decision on a certain matter. In a way, I kind of see myself doing this. I hate it when things are out of order or when certain aspects of my life aren't resolved. Maybe this is the reason why I always tend to be the mediator for certain situations in my personal life. The ability to judge and think clearly does solve issues. 


My Daily Life Examples
Extraverted: Being social....Speaking up in class, voicing opinions, interacting with friends


Intuitive: Knowing the outcome of my friends' grades by the way they study lol. 


Thinking: Working on hw, deciding logically to go out or study, debating if a person is cool to hang out with or a pain in the a**...etc


Judging: Working on deadlines, resolving conflicts(friendships)....(this one was hard, this is all I have) 


:D